Shia The Right Path

The Rigth Path The Only Way

Archive for February, 2007

Please Help To Stop This Insulting, that is in my Contry !

Posted by shiaonline on February 24, 2007

The criminal parts of the Koran

 

Please Help To Stop This Insulting, that is in my Contry !

Its just getting worse, and we in here as Muslim’s cant do anything, we are stopped each time we try.

Aminah.

The mainstream media in Denmark will not release our press release. So now we have send it to Al Jazeera, and we will try to get in touch with the foreign medias. Maybe they are not so reluctant as the danish, who definately are afraid of making another Muhammed crisis.

Billedet “http://politiken.dk/archive/00174/Tilbeh_r_174391c.jpg” kan ikke vises, da det indeholder fejl.

The leader of SIAD, Anders Gravers

The danish party, SIAD, demands parts of the Koran forbidden in Denmark in accordance with the Danish Constitution

SIAD hereby draws attention to the fact that the Koran is in violation of the
Danish Constitution’s paragraphs 67 and 69. SIAD further claims that mosques
should be forbidden in consonance with paragraph 78, clause 2.

SIAD also demands that all koran verses incompatible with Danish customs and
traditional values should be banned in accordance with the Danish
Constitution’s paragraphs 67 and 69, which states that “Citizens have the
right to form communities with a view to practising religion in accordance
with their faith, but on condition that nothing is taught or done that is at
odds with morality or public order”.

Paragraph 69 explains this injunction in more detail. “The status of
religious communities outside the Danish Folkekirke shall be specified by
law”.

We also demand that the Minister of Justice apply paragraph 78, clause 2 of
the Danish constitution, which states that “societies using violence or
seeking to achieve their ends with violence, fomentation of violence or other
unlawful pressure on those of a different opinion, shall by dissolved by law”.

According to paragraph 78 clause 2 this automatically includes every mosque
in so far as those parts of the koran in inciting to violence, murder or
threats to people of different opinions are read out there.
SIAD has previously demanded a prohibition of the koran in 2005, but this
time we demand it in accordance with the Danish Constitution, which the
minister of justice has sworn to uphold.

SIAD, Stop the islamification of Denmark

For contact: Anders Gravers

Tlf: +45 96771784 mobile: +45 61916026

e-mail: kontakt@siad.dk

http://siad.wordpress.com


Posted in ANOUNCEMENT NEW'S OF UPDATE'S, ARTICLES OF INTEREST, WHAT'S HAPPEN JUST NOW FOR SHIA MUSLIM'S | No Comments »

Ashura Mourning in Denmark !

Posted by shiaonline on February 24, 2007

ASHURA IN DENMARK

Ashura in Denmark !

This Year We where Gathered many people in Cobenhagen, I was so lucky that a fellow Muslim, got some picture’s from that.

I was in that unlucky situation,that i didnt bring my Camera,so no pictures this year, but again Im helped out..


Thank you, Very very much Dear sweetshenu


Ashura This Year Was Also a Speciel day, as We Muslim’s in Denmark also are Fighting with other thing’s.

We must face insulting’s by people in Common, and it was shown on Ashura.

Our Mourning was foremost in regard to Imam Hussein, and with our tear’s we also signified our grief toward’s all The Cruelty that goes on in the world.

We face insult’s,killing’s of our Brother’s and Sister’s ect…and in here we feel that too.

But Ashura this year was Big..So many came and street’s where filled up, We walked from Central station of Cobenhagen and direct in middle of City..through alot of street’s and ended at our Mosque Imam Ali..wich are the Largest Shiite mosque in Denmark..

Aminah.alqaem.org

www.aminah.shiahosting.com



AZADARI

1.The Heat of Husaini Love
The Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) said:
Surely, there exists in the hearts of the Mu’ mineen, with respect to the martyrdom of Husain (A.S.), a heat that never subsides.
Mustadrak al-Wasail, vol. 10,pg. 318
2.A’ashura- A Day of Grief
Imam Reza (A.S.) said:
The one for whom the day of A’shura is a day of tragedy, grief and weeping, Allah The Mighty, The Glorious, shall make the Day of Judgment, a day of joy and happiness for him.
Bihar al-Anwar, vol,: 44,pg: 284

Long live the banner of Islam which was saved by the holy blood of the Martyrs in Kerbala..

 

Hussain Hussain Oh Hussain

Every day is Ashura and every land is Kerbala


Posted in ANOUNCEMENT NEW'S OF UPDATE'S, EVENT'S ISLAM | 1 Comment »

Devils Deception of the Nasibi Wahabis

Posted by shiaonline on February 20, 2007

Devils Deception of the Nasibi Wahabis

“A comprehensive research in to the Nasibis (wahabis/deobandis) you can ever find anywhere.”

The motivation behind the writing of this book came about from my personal experience. From my humble Christian background Allah (swt) guided me to his deen (religion). The brothers who converted me were themselves Salafi and hence I was indoctrinated to their aqeedah (ideology). The earliest thing that I was told was that I should be weary of the enemies of Islam disguised as Muslims such as Shi’as who portrayed Islam on the outside but were infact kaffir, on account of the “facts” such as:

  1. They believe that the Qur’an has verses missing from it.
  2. They curse the Sahaba and wives of the Prophet(s).
  3. They believe that the revelation should have gone to Ali, but Gabriel (as) accidentally conveyed it to Prophet Muhammad (s). As such they curse Gabriel when they complete their prayers.
  4. They beat themselves in Muharram and fornicate in the precincts of their mosques on the 10th night - any male product from this illegal union is named Hussain, and any girl is named Zaynab.

You can imagine how this made me feel, being constantly told about this, time and time again. Hence I bore extreme hatred towards the Shi’a in my heart. As a brother told me “You should hate the Shi’a with a vengeance”.

Two years after I reverted I married a Salafi sister of South Asian descent - whilst practising, she was rather less exuberant than I was in active Dawah activities.

A few weeks after we married, very close friends of my wife invited us both to dinner. It was only when I arrived there that I learnt that the family were Shi’a, had I known earlier I would have probably never gone.

The host was very kind, but kept asking me questions on my beliefs etc. I tried to side-track, but he kept prying and this made be feel very uneasy. This was our first meeting but we met many more times in the coming weeks, on account of the fact that his place of work was next to the University where I studied. He tried his hardest to convince me that the Shi’a were correct in their beliefs, but I simply programmed myself to believe that he was a kaffir who was practising Taqiyyah. Despite this after a year of heated discussions my heart was starting to accept some of his arguments. Whilst I would simply regurgitate whatever my Salafi brothers had taught me - he would always reply logically and would back up his comments by citing traditions from classical works such as Sahih al Bukhari.

In truth I had not discussed any of these conversations to my Salafi brothers, until I was out one day and visited a market stall that was run by two Salafi reverts. After our general salutations I informed one of the brothers that I had a friend who was Shi’a and inquired whether he knew anything about the Shi’a faith. No sooner did I say the name “Shi’a” that the brother’s face changed colour, he said:

“Brother don’t talk to them they are kaffir (infidels), they believe that the Qur’an has verses missing”.

I told him that the Shi’a I had spoken to denied this and countered me by presenting a tahreef tradition from Sahih al Bukhari - with Umar stating that a Surah on stoning is missing. The brother was shocked and after about a minute’s silence he said:

“brother they did black magic with your eyes you didn’t see it!”

This really made me laugh and I walked off. I proceeded to do my shopping and was just passing the stall again when the brother called me over and introduced me to a revert who he acclaimed as an “expert on Shi’aism”. The ‘expert’ said:

“So you wanna know about the Shi’a kaffir, all you need to know is that they believe in 12 Gods”.

Even I from my general conversations with the Shi’a brother knew that this was a blatant lie. I then decided to test him by quizzing the fact that Shi’as believe ‘Ali to be the Prophet (s)’s legitimate successor and I cited the Sahih tradition ‘Ali is to me as Harun is to Musa except there shall be no Prophet after me’.

The ‘expert’ then countered this by asking:

“And what did he (s) say about Umar[r]?”

I knew exactly what he was asking and said:

“If there had to be a Prophet after me it would be Umar”.

The expert patted me on the back and said:

“Exactly brother”. I then asked him “That being the case why did Umar not become the first Khalifa? Is this not an insult to Hadhrath Umar?”

The expert looked bemused, smiled and said:

“Brother you’ve just used your Aql (reason) and that’s haraam”.

It was that reply that will act as a permanent memory for me. I still remember looking over to the revert brother who owned the stall following this reply, he smiled a half smile, that to me suggested that he was about as convinced at the reply as I was. For me this was the turning point in my life. The sheer stupidity and lies I heard at that stall convinced me that the Salafis were trying to cover something up. Alhamdolillah, the ‘expert’ achieved greater success in guiding me to the Shi’a than the Shi’a brother had, despite a year of rigorous debating! It was his blatant lies and lack of logic that repelled me away from the Salafis and attracted me to the Ahl’ul bayt (as).

You might ask ‘what has this to do with the preface?’ - well only a handful of brothers are fortunate enough to ever meet knowledgeable Shi’as and learn the actual truth. As the vast bulk of reverts are brought to the Din by the Salafi’s the opportunity of them ever actually meeting and discussing matters with Shi’as is highly unlikely. This is increased when one takes into account the level of propaganda and lies that are pumped into a revert’s mind with regards to the Shi’a and what they allegedly believe. When I look back at my time with the Salafis I recall that they never talked about ‘Ali (as) - why? Well since becoming Shi’a, truth has been made manifest - they are the Nasibis, his enemies - and are hiding their enmity behind the “Sunni label”.

That’s why I had asked the brother who sacrificed so many hours of his time to guide me, to write a rebuttal of their lies and expose their actual aqeedah to the world. I hope that this book opens the minds of my fellow reverts who have been deceived by the Salafis. It is indeed sad that these same reverts who embraced Islam having researched the truth with an open mind and logical reasoning, abandon these same principles when being indoctrinated into the Salafi movement, preferring to blindly follow every word of their Nasibi Shaykhs. I also hope that the book acts as a source of inspiration to my down-trodden Shi’a brothers and sisters who have to put up with the Salafi Nasibi propaganda onslaught on a daily basis.

Your brother in Islam,
Abdul Hakeem Oranu.

 

 Devils Deception of the Nasibi Wahabis   (831 KB)

 

Billedet “http://www.answering-ansar.org/aDecors/logo.jpg” kan ikke vises, da det indeholder fejl.

 

Posted in WAHABI SECT ! WHO ARE THEY ! | No Comments »

Introduction: WAHABI

Posted by shiaonline on February 20, 2007

There is no doubt that the Shi’a of Ali (as) are a peace loving people, and are the standard bearers of unity amongst Muslims. The Shi’a Ulema have striven hard towards this goal inviting our brothers to sit and talk with us, it should be pointed out that the invitation does not constitute a defect in religious belief on our part.

It seemed that their efforts had borne fruit when in 1959 Shaykh Mahmood Shaltoot, Grand Mufti of Al Azhar University issued a fatwa declaring Fiqh-e-Jaferiyya an Islamic school of thought, and adherents were free to adopt it in the same way that they could follow the other four schools.

Despite this major breakthrough, it is with deep regret that we look around us and see that despite entering a new century, this polemical battle, with those who support and revere the enemies of Hadhrath Ali (as) is still going on today.

The contemporary Nasibis, the Deobandis (rigid Hanafees from the Indian Subcontinent) and the ‘la madhabi’ (Salafis from Saudi Arabia) have sought to undermine the spirit of the Al Azhar fatwa by orchestrating a well financed / baseless campaign of lies against the Shi’a, aimed at dividing the Muslims. Just like their Nasibi ancestors who sought to undermine and ruin Imam Ali (as) by accusing him of killing Hadhrath Uthman (when they themselves had his blood on their hands) to the point of slandering, cursing and fighting him, their modern day offspring have likewise adopted these same methods against his Shi’a. They have used every form of deception possible to achieve this aim. This has included the common Nasibi tactic of distorting / denying and re-writing historical facts, misquoting Shi’a texts and intentionally lying about the Shi’a faith to the ignorant masses so as to create a hatred of the adherents of the Ahlul’bayt. They are undoubtedly the leaders of sedition and they are responsible for inciting fitnah and sectarian violence everywhere they operate- in exchange for ‘lucrative’ handouts in the form of cash, presents and young boys from their Saudi / US paymasters.

Curiously whilst attacking the Shi’a, these groups are themselves divided and they frequently issue takfir against one another. The Prophet (s) had once compared the Ummah to a body. The Nasibis are a cancer attacking the body. It is imperative that we uproot this cancer from the body so as to save this Ummah from further fragmentation and destruction.

Our methodology

We will adopt the same steps, as would a Doctor seeking to identify a patient’s ailment. He would:

  1. Diagnose the condition - We will likewise diagnose the symptoms of a Nasibi.
  2. Determine whether the symptoms have spread - We will examine the extent to which Nasibi thinking has penetrated through the body.
  3. Take a biopsy to use quantifiable evidence / tissue diagnosis etc - We will likewise rely on quantifiable evidence presenting facts based on history, hadith and the texts of the Nasibis.

Defending our approach

There is no doubt be some that will criticize the harsh / attacking style used by the book. We however, feel that we have been left with no other choice. Having had to endure attack after attack of volatile abuse from the Nasibis whether that be in book form or on the Internet, we feel that the time has come to adopt this approach.

We wish to make it clear from the onset that this is not a defensive work where we set our stall on the market explaining our beliefs to passers by. There are excellent sites performing that very function those who want to know the truth about Shi’a faith should go there (e.g. www.al-islam.org). This book takes the method of attack.

 

Posted in WAHABI SECT ! WHO ARE THEY ! | No Comments »

Defining a Nasibi

Posted by shiaonline on February 20, 2007

Defining a Nasibi

For an introduction to the literal meaning of Nasibi we have relied on the definitions stipulated by several recognised Ahl’ul Sunnah scholars:
“Famhuus” page 53, Chapter “Al Ba”.
“Taj al Uroous page 277, Volume 4 Chapter “Al Ba Murtazi al Zubaydi”.
“Lisan al Arab” page 762, by Ibn Manzur.
“Hadiya al Sahil ay adalta al Masail” page 96.
“Tadhrib al Radhi” page 311 Allamah Jalaladeen as-Suyuti.
“Akrab al Muwarid” page 2 Chapter “Lananat Nusub”.

In “Lisan al Arab” by Ibn Manzur states:

“Nawasib are those who hate Hadhrath Ali, and embrace that hatred as part of their faith”

May Allah’s curse be upon such people!

In “Taj al Uroous“, we read:

“Nasibi are those who hate Ameer ul Momineen Ali bin Abi Talib (as) and take that enmity as part of their faith”.

Tadhrib al Radhi” provides the following definition:

“Nasibi ideology means hating Ali and preferring Mu’awiya”.

Hadiya al Sahil” elaborates yet further:

“Nasibi ideology is a type of flawed character that is very bad, in its worst form is has a hatred for the Imam of Guidance Hadhrath Ali, and takes this as part of its Deen / Iman”.

Note that we have proven the definition by faithfully translating the works of Ahl’ul Sunnah and we invite our Sunni brothers and sisters to ponder. Do not be fooled by these long beards because among these are the enemies of Imam ‘Ali (as). Their enmity is evident from their speeches, but is disguised in such a way that the ordinary man would not recognise it. Their methodology is just like that of hypocrites. They read the Kalima with their tongues but their hearts are polluted with hatred and the proof is their animosity towards Hadhrath ‘Ali (as). Just like a bad foot odour they carry the stench of Nasibi thought everywhere they go - seeking to deceive the majority by proclaiming that this is the correct faith of Ahl’ul Sunnah wa al Jamaa.

To recognise the Nasibi let us investigate the matter further.

Pinpointing the Nasibi founding forefathers

Whilst defining a Nasibi the pen of the Ahl’ul Sunnah Ulema has been somewhat reluctant to pinpoint where Nasibis existed in history and who their Imams were.

Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz makes two interesting comments in his “Haddeeya Mujedeeya“:

“One who fights ‘Ali [r] with enmity is a kaffir according to the ijma of Ahl’ul Sunnah.”
“Haddeeya Mujedeeya” by Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi page 813

“Whoever deems ‘Ali [r] to be a kaffir or opposes his khilafath is a kaffir, this trait was evident amongst the Khawaarij at Naharwaan”.
“Haddeeya Mujedeeya” by Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi page 813

On the same page Shah Abdul Aziz seeks to protect Mu’awiya by pointing out that Mu’awiya does NOT come within this definition since:

“Mu’awiya and the people of Syria sought revenge for the killing of Uthman”.

Unfortunately Shah’s efforts to protect Mu’awiya and his supporters are in vain because it is an established fact that Mu’awiya and his clansmen:

  • Opposed the khilafath of Imam Ali (as)
  • Bore enmity to Imam Ali (as) by cursing him
  • Fought him

All of these points have been discussed at length in our refutation of Ansar’s defence of Mu’awiya.

Hence we have pinpointed those that first wore the Nasibi garb, now let us delve further.

Identifying and recognising Nasibi ideology

Several authoritative Sunni works are being relied on for this section.

Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz states in “Taufa Ithna Ashari” states:

“Marwan was a Nasibi and was in fact its leader”.
Taufa Ithna Ashari” page 95 Chapter 2 paragraph number 74, by Al Muhaddith Shah ‘Abdul Aziz Dehlavi

Maulana Sayyid Lal Shah Bukhari attributes a different name as the actual Imam of the Nasibis, he writes:

“The founder of Nasibi ideology was Mu’awiya”.
“Isthakhlaaf ai Yazid” by Maulana Sayyid Lal Shah Bukhari page 216

In “Al Bidayah al Nihayah” Ibn Kathir states:

“Marwan was so evil that he would curse Hadhrath ‘Ali”.
“Al Bidayah al Nihayah” page 259, Volume 8 by Ibn Kathir

In “Fatwa Azizi” by Shah Abdul Aziz we read that:

“Mu’awiya would curse Hadhrath ‘Ali (as)”.
“Fatwa Azizi” by al’ Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi page 123

Hence Marwan and Mu’awiya were both Nasibis. They were enemies of ‘Ali and embraced this as part of their faith. Their followers are also Nasibis. Their hatred takes numerous guises. In their lectures and writings their Nasibi thought becomes evident as does their hatred for the Shi’a of ‘Ali. This party who pass fatwas of Kufr upon the Shi’a are in fact the spiritual descendants of Marwan and Mu’awiya and thus they adhere to an illegitimate belief formulated in the minds of the enemies of Hadhrath Ali (as).

From the outside one might mistakenly assume that Nasibis are pious adherents of the Sunnah. In their speeches they advocate the importance of adhering to the Sunnah, they wear long caftans, carry miswak, grow long beards, and lick their fingers after a meal - why? Because they will tell you that this was the Sunnah of the Prophet (s). It is curious that they adhere to such minute details, mimicking the Prophet (s) even in his dress sense and yet the important Sunnah, namely that of loving and adhering to the teachings of his Ahl’ul bayt (as) is rejected by them. What is even worse is the fact that they display hatred towards Ahl’ul bayt (as), evident from the fact that they regard their enemies as their Imams.

The casual observer may indeed be taken in by their acts of charity, Islamic circles, lengthy prayers etc - but the reality is these deeds are of no avail, for Rasulullah (s) declared:

“Hatred of ‘Ali is such a thing that no good deeds will benefit, whilst love of ‘Ali is such a thing that no bad deeds will harm you”
al-Nasa’ih al-Kaafiyah page 67

Mu’awiya and Yazid were the Founding Forefathers of Nasibi ideology

A peculiarity of the Nasibis is the immense love they hold for Mu’awiya, the enemy of Ali. The reason is due the fact that the Nasibis owe their religious ideology to him. In the same way a child seeks to cover up the sins of his father, the Nasibis try their utmost to conceal the actions of their father Mu’awiya in hope that the cat is not let out of the bag and their hypocrisy is not publicly unveiled. They will try to convince their faithful that Mu’awiya was a pious man who never hated Ali (as) who fought him for the pleasure of Allah (swt). Alas the Nasibis can continue to deceive their flock but the classical works of the Ahl’ul Sunnah do not tally up with their lies, and as we shall prove the origin of the Nasibi movement in fact lies at the door of their beloved Imam Mu’awiya. We have again relied on two recognised Sunni sources for